Table or Booth?

What Makes a Great Product Owner?

A friend of mine is working with scrum.org and was asking questions about product ownership.  This got me thinking.  So, I threw together this quick list of things that, I think, make a great Product Owner.

The Real Value of Money

Investment advisors like to talk about about inflation these days in terms of raw money supply/purchasing power.  But there's more to this.

Today's Scarcity: Reputation

In the recent InfoQ article about free Test Driven Development classes in our new 'Gift Economy', there is a misguided notion that fundamental economics have somehow evolved to such an extent that scarcity isn't an economic driver any more:

http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/08/agile-training-gift;jsessionid=0E73B11FC39B86C6019D0CE4B3DD1307

I disagree.  As I state in my comment to the article,  I suspect the people pushing this gimmick do so more to attack capitalism as a whole than for any other reason.

Will Your Project Succeed?

Ultimately group success of any kind is determined by good people doing good work.  Period.  A good sponsor, designer, and developer can build great software, no matter what the process or team structure – should they care enough to do it.

Dribble

The road to hell is paved with Waterfall.

Why then is there fire you ask?

Good question. I think, because, although the falls may be spectacular, in the end, often all that's left is a dribble.

No 'Team' in 'I': Going Solo with WACD

To continue from an earlier post on the WACD methodology, here are some tips for keeping the pesky 'team' concept from eroding your development sovereignty.

Earnings-Based Consumption

We cannot spend our way to good economic health, even in the short run.  We have to produce.

John Stiglitz, Chief Economist of the World Bank from 1997 - 2002 took callers on CSPAN this morning, one of which was a democrat who suggested (paraphrasing), "With the economic downturn and the tax payers being the problem, with the bad mortgages and such, why not just give every American one million dollars? Then people would spend money, helping businesses, and letting people keep their houses and jobs."

Why stop at one million?? Why not 10? How about 100 million? We'd all be set for life.

I'm all for consumption as a important part of market health. However, the problem with consumption based on money given versus money earned is that, when given, you have no skin in the game. No risk taken. This changes everything. If you lose it all because of a bad decision, oh well. 

With money earned, you have a vested interest in not seeing it disappear. With money earned, you do your best to get the maximum value you can for every penny. This kind of incentive works.  Money-given based consumption eventually reduces productivity to point of total dependency.  This is socialism and, as history shows, has a strong track record for destroying markets.

Enterprise Bearware

The price customers pay for software and the level of usability they get with that software is inversely proportional.  As long as it solves a big business problem or two, it doesn't matter how easy it is to actually use the stuff.

Hurricane of Hope

If you haven't seen Robert Tracinski's controversial piece about the New Orleans disaster, check it out.  Whether or not you agree with his position, it's atypical, intelligent commentary on the matter.

On Career Choices...

"One of the most valuable things my father taught me is an old Yorkshire saying: where there's muck, there's brass.  Meaning that unpleasant work pays."

- Paul Graham, Why Smart People Have Bad Ideas

A few other useful programming career-oriented links:

• How to Keep Your Job
• Discussion with Dave Thomas and Andy Hunt
• Advice from Monster.com
• Paul Graham: Hackers and Painters
• Keep Offshoring From Taking You