Comparison of two open source and two paid continuous integration servers:
« Flow Control In Scrum (Or Any Development Process) | Main | No thanks, God »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455a82969e20120a53d8cd0970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Continuous Integration Server Review: CruiseControl, Hudson, TeamCity and Cruise:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Sun now offers Hudson support: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2009/08/announcing_sun.html
Posted by: Alexis MP | August 12, 2009 at 03:46 AM
Thanks for sharing a detailed evaluation.
I wanted to add that Hudson as of the current release (1.319) is capable of doing parallel builds of a single project. I also know that TeamCity is capable of doing this.
Perhaps those were recent changes after you've evaluated them, but just so that your readers will get up-to-date information.
Posted by: Kohsuke Kawaguchi | August 12, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Thanks for the feedback, Kohsuke & Alex. I updated the article and the spreadsheet.
Posted by: Ben | August 12, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Thank you for the article, very useful!
Posted by: migui | August 31, 2009 at 07:47 AM