« RIAs - The New Web UI | Main | Google Mail Down »

October 14, 2008

Earnings-Based Consumption

We cannot spend our way to good economic health, even in the short run.  We have to produce.

John Stiglitz, Chief Economist of the World Bank from 1997 - 2002 took callers on CSPAN this morning, one of which was a democrat who suggested (paraphrasing), "With the economic downturn and the tax payers being the problem, with the bad mortgages and such, why not just give every American one million dollars? Then people would spend money, helping businesses, and letting people keep their houses and jobs."

Why stop at one million?? Why not 10? How about 100 million? We'd all be set for life.

I'm all for consumption as a important part of market health. However, the problem with consumption based on money given versus money earned is that, when given, you have no skin in the game. No risk taken. This changes everything. If you lose it all because of a bad decision, oh well. 

With money earned, you have a vested interest in not seeing it disappear. With money earned, you do your best to get the maximum value you can for every penny. This kind of incentive works.  Money-given based consumption eventually reduces productivity to point of total dependency.  This is socialism and, as history shows, has a strong track record for destroying markets.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455a82969e201053588d81f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Earnings-Based Consumption:

Comments

"This is socialism and, as history shows, has a strong track record for destroying markets."

Just wait a few years before markets destroy the society... Money is the curse !

To understand : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeitgeist,_the_Movie

Also on wikipedia: Market (definition): "any of a variety of different systems, institutions, procedures, social relations and infrastructures whereby persons trade, and goods and services are exchanged, forming part of the economy."

If 'persons' form a society, then the previous comment's statement that "markets destroy society" implies that the act of exchanging goods or services destroys people.

Thousands of years of history prove the exact opposite.

"Markets destroy society" is an idiotic assertion and a fine example of the psuedo-intellectualism of a rising class of ignorant socialists.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment